print interview

Sigill 1998.

1. Can you tell us details about the history of ORDO EQUILIBRIO?

Ordo Equilibrio originated in May of 1993.

The inspiration and objective to initiate an individual project concurred during my involvement in Archon Satani, as Mikael Stavöstrand decided to form his side project 'Inanna' in 1991.
But Ordo Equilibrio awaited to resolve until May of 1993 as I decided to abandon my participation in Archon Satani by reason of several insignificant inconsistencies pertaining to the bands current status and continuing progress.

Ordo Equilibrio's primary purpose was to serve as the aesthetic and creative outlet for a multitude of ideas, aesthetics, ambitions and ideals.
And which still remains the primary objective of the foundation today.

Discography.

1995 'Reaping the fallen, The first harvest' CD.

1997 'The Triumph of Light.... and Thy Thirteen Shadows of Love' CD.

1997 'I4I' 7" Picture Disc. Limited to 1313 copies.

Forthcoming in 1998 'Conquest, Love & Self Perseverance' CD.

2. You used the painting '4 of wands' from the Crowley - Tarot on 'Reaping the fallen....' and 'The Triumph....'.
What are your views on Crowley and Tarot?

I decided to use the symbol of the '4 of wands' by means of its signification of Balance.
Signifying the flames of energy in play, asserting balance, uniting Completion and Limitation through the seeds of disorder.

This signification is consequently amplified through the seal's various, binary significations of Completion and Balance, which conform a variety of assertions representative of Balance and Completion as part of Equilibrio.
Love and War, Yin and Yang, Light and Dark, all of which are representative of Ordo Equilibrio.

The symbol serves as an ideal representation of Ordo Equilibrio and our philosophical, ideological and spiritual conceptions and expositions.
Converging and signifying both Balance and Completion along with the force of Will.
All of which are represented as part of my individual understandings and objectives.

I believe Crowley was an interesting individual.
Tainted by his childhood and his parents engagement in the Plymouth parish he came to be absolutely inclined towards debauchery, pleasure and various magical workings.
Likely as a consequence of his individually residing inclinations, but furthermore as a livelihood in opposition to the teachings and understandings of his parents.

Crowley was an interesting character and certainly something of a stereotype role model of the absolute individualist.
And even though he died as a bitter old man, he certainly managed to indulge in plenty of his individual desires, and which is truly a behavior I personally endorse.

'Every voluntary sexual experience, is ultimately more positive and conferring, when utilized as a sexual encounter, regardless of the outcome, than any intense and compelling sexual fantasy, never utilized'.
'Lets Celebrate, the Exploration of the Human Body'. Ordo Equilibrio, 'Conquest Love & Self Perseverance'.

Which is furthermore possible to employ in any situation of ones individual desires, whether they are sexually related or not.

My views on Tarot.
Tarot is an interesting conception. But as I believe the deck is but an appliance of the practitioner, such as many occult/spiritual applications, whether its a crystal ball, tea or the inside of a palm, Tarot itself is but an extension of the practitioner's possible capability to reach inside him/herself and utilize the subconsciously residing potentials of reason and clairvoyance.
While the various systems, whether its from within 'The book of Thoth' or elsewhere, are but guidelines to reach that point of comprehension.
Tarot itself, without utilizing the aptitude, does not achieve this.

I believe Crowley's tarot to be interesting and symbolically stimulating as I am able to relate to its very unique aesthetic imagery, and the symbolism he choose to utilize.

4. What has been the inspiration for 'Lilith'? Are you fascinated by the goddess of the same name?
I'm not sure if you take it as a compliment, but I know some Wiccans who said that 'Lilith' is one of the most beautiful poems on the goddess they ever read.

The inspiration to 'Walpurgisnacht in the Grotto. Dancing with Lilith' derived as a vision of Lilith attending the celebrations of Walpurgis.
Appearing as beautiful female, she wanders pale and luscious, almost silent, amongst flaming pyres and rising fresh pines.
Attending the celebration she graciously valses barefoot through the dusk of night, robed in white seemingly transparent veils to the sound of vibrant drums.
She dances almost weightless, as her luscious body, almost naked, pulsates of recondite passion.

I am symbolically interested in Lilith as a character of profound, fundamental feminism, in addition to her relation to Lucifer.
Likewise abolished from heaven to Hell by reasons of insubordination.
Refusing to submit to Adam by reasons of her desire as a woman to be coequal to man, and on top during the act of intercourse.

Lilith signifies resistance, liberation and beauty, along with the profundity of female sexuality, female force, capability and aptitude.

Lilith is according to my conception feminism utilized correspondingly to femininity.

Sure I relate to their appreciation of the specific lyric as a compliment.
I see no reason not to.
It likewsie suggests that they are not all of equally pragmatic understandings.

5. Do you see any parallels between Asatru and Satanism?
For many protagonists form the Scandinavian music scene there seems to be a strong link between these two paths, which are from my point of view totally different.
Another connection goes by the name of Edered Thorsson who leads the 'Rune Gild' while still being a member of the 'Temple of Set'.

Both religions/conceptions are spiritual understandings of similar aims and substances: Strength (Thor), Wisdom (Odin), Love and Prosperity (Freya & Frey) etc. etc.

Both understandings furthermore seek beyond the present self for further force and capacity, the Asatru practitioner likely from either Thor, Odin, Freya, Hel etc. etc., and the Satanist depending on his/her Satanic inclination, likely from Lucifer, Satan, Beelzebub, Seth etc. etc., or likely from within him or herself.

Practitioners of either understanding consequently seek to expand their potentialities.
And do so by way of ritual as an application of utilization, canalization, celebration and tribute.

There within I see similarity, but not necessarily alignment.

Unfortunately I am not familiar with Edered Thorsson, but as part of the Scandinavian music scene I believe the two conceptions converge within the understandings of the practitioner, by reasons of the objectives mentioned above, rather than by nature of the individual conception.
And Asatru has come to be considered as strength through the signification of Odin and Thor, I believe certain alleged Satanists have become inclined to adopt Asatru as a binary conception to Satanism by reasons of strength and the symbolical authority incorporated as part of Asatru.
For the purpose of utilizing an assumed 'evil' and aesthetically authoritative imagery.
But too commonly without knowledge or respect pertaining to the adopted symbolism.

Another parallel reason is naturally founded on the situation that Asatru is part of our Scandinavian heritage, and therefore easily adopted and converged as part of any formerly subsiding understanding, whether it is spiritual, philosophical or political.

6. I always perceived the writing and ideas of LaVey as unbelievably superficial. Anyway, what inscription should be carved unto Anton LaVey's tombstone?

I do not agree with your understanding regarding LaVey's writings being entirely and unbelievably superficial.
I believe it was never LaVey's primary ambition to be completely abundant in his explanations.
He thereby aimed for the capability of the conceiver and his/her individual ability to relate to his writings.

I believe many people wish LaVey could have been more excessive in his way of writing, possibly explaining and evolving his understandings further.
But leaving his writings at this, and what could possibly be perceived as shallow and superficial, he contributes with the possibility of contemplation.
Furthermore enabling the individual to adapt and intellectually alternate the understandings to suite his or her individual needs and desires.

This could be just my individual understanding of the substance of his workings, and that he actually was incapable of elaborating his ideas further at the point of creation.
But as LaVey stated as part of the Satanic Bible, that the incorporated conceptions are merely to be regarded as guidelines.
And if there are eventual sentiments that you dislike, then discard them and consequently practice solely those which you find individually gratifying.

What should be carved on his tombstone?
Thankfully I do not believe there will be any erection of a tombstone in memory of Anton Zandor LaVey, but in case I am completely mistaken I believe a suitable memoriam could be; 'Here lays the carnal remains of a man more willing to rule in Hell, than serve in Heaven.... may continuing enlightenment follow in his footsteps'.

7. You seem to be fascinated with values like inner strength, power, integrity etc. Do you think that the modern world has a lack of these values (I certainly do so!)?
Do you find it difficult to integrate such higher values in everyday life?

I believe you already know the answer to this question.
Do I believe the current status of this world is deficit of values such as strength, power and integrity? Yes absolutely.
These attributes are of no merit in modern day society as the opposite attributes would render deficit folks without soul, imagination, capability or integrity.
More likely inclined to be controlled, conformed and herded like sheep.

Strength, capability and integrity rather encourage individualism and aptitude, and are consequently dreaded and desperately sought to be destroyed by the ruling establishment, as qualities that would engender a folk more inclined to see to the prosperity of themselves, rather than to the prosperity of the establishment.
And which conclusively would bring about the downfall of this prevailing establishment.

I do not necessarily find it difficult to integrate values as strength, capability and integrity as part of my everyday life.
I believe they are much rather a necessary requirement to function adequately.

8. Do you see the occult just as a philosophy?
To what degree are you involved with practical occultism?

The occult is not solely consistent of philosophy, but rather established on various philosophies, and in addition incorporated alongside an equal magnitude of concrete practices.
Such as for instance, ritual, ceremonial sacrifice, ceremony, emotional canalization and numerous magical workings of dissimilar objectives and results.

I am not at this present time engaged in any direct forms occult practices, but merely in indirect workings as part of Ordo Equilibrio, through the creation and application of our workings.

9. I think I know the answer from your lyrics, but anyway: What are your views on Christianity?

Christianity opposes human nature and does not acknowledge the basic principals that govern our existence.

It is constructed in circumference to a desperate wish for human change.
The wish that mankind was not as and whom it is, and that other principals governed the human procession rather than those of all living species.

Consequently it does not posses the capability of providing the human procession with the basic ideals it requires for its continuance and existential evolution.

Christianity is therefore merely a literal and philosophical hypothesis, such as all fictional workings relating to the absolute and invariable betterment of human nature.

It incorporates and utilizes a completely inhumane and existentially crucial practice in absolute opposition to nature's natural procession of Creation, Destruction and Renewal, as it disbands the scared force of Destruction.
Invariably concluding in the inevitable destruction of mankind, and possibly the planet itself.
Which otherwise, ceaselessly would survive, evolve and adapt.

I do neither acknowledge Jesus as the son of god, or such as a religious martyr. He is merely such as Christianity, a fictional hypothesis, and the invariable reflection of others men's wishes that someone should have existed in the above mentioned form.
As a role model for generations to come.

He is the fictional and partially genuine documentation of others philosophers wishes of a man capable of changing their present cultural, religious, and sociological situation.

Should not the bible be observed with an equal measure of skepticism and disbelief such as all other fictional and historical documentations currently are, and formerly have been?

I personally observe the new testament as merely a fictional documentation, seeking to pass on the glorified myths of a truly less significant character of those times.
Possibly a rebel wishing to overthrow the Romans, or perhaps even a less important but cherished religious leader in an actually existing coven in that day and age.
But truly not the alleged holy figure he has come to represent.

No records or documentations have up until today been found from that very day and age besides the new testament itself, that points to the existence of a man by the name of Jesus of Nazarene.
No approved scriptures, besides the holy scripture of the appointed faith itself, acknowledge either his birth or his crucifixion.
And up until the point a documentation does, I see no reason not to question and distrust the existence of the so called Jesus Christ as well as the overall truth and fidelity of the above mentioned documents.

Generation after generation are thankfully loosing their interest in events related to the Christian establishment, as for instance, attending the communion, saying grace, not cursing etc. etc.
But despite of what could be conceived as a gratifying situation, people are still getting married in church and having their children baptized in church, consequently remaining at least latent members of the Christian society.
And thus becoming ethically, morally and intellectually tainted by the virtues of the Christian faith, and furthermore infecting their progeny, and their progeny, and their progeny and so forth.
Making the Christian establishment and its accompanying ideological and ethical standards prevail, alongside the continuing annihilation of this world.

So to say that Christianity is without impact is to exaggerate.
And to assume that any Christian self-decline will pursue naturally, without effort, and without acknowledging this current situation is to deceive oneself.
Equally ignorant would be to believe that cancer would disappear without treatment as long as you do not acknowledge it.

10. What characters from the world's history did influence you most?
Any philosophers, artists, authors etc. you specially adore?
Who are worth to be emulated?

I believe entire events as part of our historical past and present, along with the decisions that were and invariably are made, in addition to the complete resolution of these decicions are inspiring and consequently intriguing to observe.
Therefore I believe that it would be wrong to say that any specific character or characters as part of our historical past have influenced me that particularly, much rather events, decisions and consequences.

Nevertheless I believe Aliester Crowley and (the Marquis) Donatien Alphonse Francois de Sade were interesting and philosophically stimulating individuals as sexual deviants and philosophers of the flesh and the mind.
Nietzsche was furthermore an inspiring philosopher, but certainly not of such extreme ideological and philosophical valuations that many tend to portray.
Nero as well as the Roman empire were also entertaining in certain aspects besides the religious.
Along with various other historical events, groupings and characters as part of our past, such as the entire foundation of the Third Reich and its abundance of esoteric incorporation, the World War II and the obvious feedback that concurs even this very day, the black plague along with the inquisition, to mention but a few.

I furthermore tend to get inspired by art, photography, film and literature of either horror, pornography or fetishism.
And consequently I foremost tend to appreciate artists such as Dario Argento, Andrew Blake and Richard Kern to mention but a few.

In conclusion, and especially deserving of praise and emulation is the inventor of the stay-up stocking.
Would I truly have realized such pleasures without her.

11. Is there a special function of ORDO EQUILIBRIO?
Self-entertainment? Do you feel linked with your audience?

Self-entertainment is naturally one function of Ordo Equilibrio as we invariably seek to create music for the sake of our individual entertainment, objectives and appreciation.
I would certainly not create music solely for the entertainment of others.
But equally significant is Ordo Equilibrio's function of creative discharge.

It is always difficult to estimate who is our audience, and thereby hard to say whether we feel linked to them or not, in terms of understanding versus misconception.

As perception is an individually related matter and as our workings seem possible to conceive differently by reasons of dissimilar aesthetic, philosophical and emotional expositions and objectives, people tend to relate to certain perspectives of our workings, and consequently overlook others.
Therefore it is hard to attain a perspective on who is truly our audience and whether they are comprehending with Ordo Equilibrio, or solely corresponding with a single understandings as part of the foundation.
But I hope our audience may relate to us in terms of understandings, aesthetic appreciation, sexual gratification etc., etc.
And furthermore realizes gratification and conceivable understanding through the utilization of our music.
And thereby, the other way around.

12. The music of yours is very dark, serious and spiritual.
As a contradiction to this I perceived some of your promo photos that shared some form of an ironic sense of humor.
Do you sometimes think that your listeners take you too seriously?

I am absolutely sincere in what I have to say, but consequently not to become a pastiche of your own seriousness as all so many bands, I seek to utilize our visual expositions as an application through which to incorporate sarcasm and irony.
In attempt to visualize a tasteful portrayal of balance, in combination with our ideological, philosophical, sexual and aesthetic appreciations.

I certainly believe our audience and people in general should take us seriously, but nevertheless I believe they should think for themselves, further conceive, and at length contemplate on the content of our emanations.

13. I read some statements of you that will without any doubt cause some problems when you will perform in Germany one time again.
I guess that you have heard of the assassins that the extreme left played on DIJ/Boyd Rice in the last year?
What do you think of such actions?
What's your view on politics in general?

I am familiar with the unfortunate incidents of DIJ and Boyd Rice at their last visit to Germany.
But unfortunately I can not recall what I possibly could have said to upset the extreme left wing, and which consequently could cause similar problems during our next performance in Germany.

I am not an unpolitical individual, but I am neither inclined to label and categorize my political understandings.
I am not especially interested in what my understandings are conceived as, whether its right wing, left wing or liberal.

What do I think of such actions? Burning down tour busses you mean. I think they useless and consequently lacking purpose.
I can only imagine that the perpetrators who arsoned the bus, later went home and put on a record by Crisis.

Even though action has come to be the only way of actually accomplishing any sort of change today, as conversation and negotiation has lost their signification, by reason of politic's sole interest in financial gain.
And even though I am not unfamiliar with the idea of political terrorism. I rather believe that this evident frustration should be directed towards an actual target, and not just be terminated as the mere consequence of their abiding ignorance.

I wish for the decline of the European Union, as it is solely an instrument of continuing finacial gain and further totalitarianism.

I wish for the liberation of drugs, as everyone are ultimately responsible for themselves and their individual progress and fortune.

I furthermore endorse sexual voyeurism along with homosexuality, as I believe each and everyone should act voluntarily and consensualy in accordance to their individual desires.

Democracy is but the political deception of letting people believe that they possess power along with the power of change.

Democracy is furthermore a political justification of integral and individual rape.
51 voters deciding in favor of decapitating the other 50 is not an uncommon consequence of the democratic process.

Dictatorship is unfortunately not an option for me, even though history proves that people easily yields to promises of guidance and alleged compassion of superior authority.

Individualism is the only option.
Lets overthrow the current political and religious establishment, and thereby cause the natural evolution of a new sociological order by way of the individual.
Who besides me is justified and capable of deciding on my behalf.
Should I not be allowed to act according to me free will as far as I am willing to accept the consequences of my actions?
I believe I should.

And furthermore I believe in the natural selection, and that certain people, beyond the limitations of racial belonging, are truly more capable and genuinely suited for survival than most others.

14. I've heard you share friendship with Eric form Les Joyaux.
How did you get in contact with them?
What are the spiritual and ideological values that you share?

I first came in contact with Eric and Les Joyaux de la Princesse in 1991-92 as he confronted me during my involvement in Archon Satani, with regards to our possible interest in participating as part of the late Zyklon B compilation.
From then on we have remained in contact, and even though I have not heard from him for quite some time, I hope we may have the possibility to realize some sort of collaboration in the future.

What spiritual and ideological sentiments do we share?
As Eric once said, I believe we stride along the same ideological path.
And which most likely is true as we have come to realize that we share a mutual understanding with regards to the prospective and symbolical destruction of Israel, Palestine and the Semitic regions all in all.
And which I believe is our foremost spiritual and ideological sentiment.

Nevertheless I believe we furthermore share a mutual interest in symbolical authority, mysticism and capacity, in addition to a mutual interest in the runes, and an aesthetic and symbolical fascination for the Third Reich.

15. What meaning has the subtitle '....Thy Thirteen Shadows of Love'?

'The Thirteen Shadows of Love' has an ambiguous signification.
And taken out of context, it could become perplexing.

The thirteen candles symbolically signify the life of Jesus, while the thirteen shadows signify his death. The fire of life extinguished.

The entire title may therefore be interpreted in two opposite ways.
Either as the triumph of Jesus, allegedly dying as a martyr for the love and continuing existence of mankind, or optionally as the triumph of Lucifer, and love as the prevailing consequence of the crucifixion and death of Jesus.
The choice rests at the hand of the interpreter.

16. Unfortunately I did not have the chance to see your performance at the CMI Festival last year.
Will there be the possibility to see you live in the near future?
What can we expect from your live performance?

As we did not perform as part of any CMI festival last year, but solely accomplished one performance altogether, supporting Blood Axis at the Cold Meat Industry birthday party in November last year, I believe you would have become disappointed.

At present there is the possibility of two upcoming Ordo Equilibrio performances.
First at the upcoming 'Wave Gothic Meeting' in Leipzig, May 28 - June 1, followed by a possible performance in Waregem, Belgium at the 'Nights in the Abyss' festival July 25 - 26, together with Arcana, Mortiis, Sanctum and possibly one more CMI band.

Besides this I hope we may have the possibility of performing in Prague following or possibly prior to our visit to Leipzig at Pfingsten, but whether this will occur still remains to be decided.

What can you expect?
Performing live we try to present an act that stands in relation to the philosophical understandings and aesthetic appreciations of the formation, whether it is of voluntary militia, or fetishism.
Further accompanied by drums, banners and flaming fires.
But as we are still investigating the possibilities and disadvantages in regard to performing Live, our performance will most certainly evolve as we proceed.

But in conclusion, do not expect anything and you will not be disappointed.

17. Can you explain the large number of headless Jesus'ses in the booklet?

There are two possible reasons for the large number of headless Jesus' as part of the booklet for 'The Triumph of Light....'.
Either one may regard them as tokens of the appointed religion's evident ignorance, or with a sense of irony as for my sincere belief that Jesus certainly could use some head.

Sigill Part 2, 1998.

(...)Lilith is according to my conception feminism utilized correspondingly to femininity.
Sure I relate to their appreciation of the specific lyric as a compliment. I see no reason not to.

1) I HAD MY DOUBTS, AS MANY PEOPLE FROM THE OCCULT SCENE REGARD THE WICCAN FAITH AS "TOO MUCH NEW AGE" OR DESCRIBE THEM AS "CHRISTIAN SOULMATES" WHICH IS A POINTLESS ACCUSATION FROM MY POINT OF VIEW.

Despite my sincere appreciation I likewise believe that particular Wiccans are overtly tending to incorporate Christianity and New Age as part of their practices.
Making them at least to some extent Christian from a spiritual point of view.

But all of them are evidently not.
And as particular individuals at the very least seem capable of relating to the appointed lyric, I am certain that various Wiccans are influenced by dissimilar forms of esoteric, religious and spiritual exertions, and consequently beyond the appointed Christian association.

(...)Another parallel reason is naturally founded on the situation that Asatru is part of our Scandinavian heritage, and therefore easily adopted and converged as part of any formerly subsiding understanding, whether it is spiritual, philosophical or political.

2) WHICH OF THESE TWO PATHS IS THE ONE YOU CAN IDENTIFY WITH?

I can relate to Asatru by way of spiritual and philosophical means, as I believe it is fundamentally consistent of sensible and humane conceptions pertaining to mankind in its entirety in relation to nature.
Side by side with deities established on human characteristics.
Representative of elementary human attributes, individually impelled by human desires and disputes, and directly engaged in the terrestrial affairs.
Active, humanlike and virtuous deities, deserving of celebration.

That is the foremost path I can relate to, alongside the collective mythos and the symbolic mysticism incorporated as part of Asatru.

(...)What should be carved on his tombstone?
Thankfully I do not believe there will be any erection of a tombstone in memory of Anton Zandor LaVey, but in case I am completely mistaken I believe a suitable memoriam could be; 'Here lays the carnal remains of a man more willing to rule in Hell, than serve in Heaven.... May continuing enlightenment follow in his footsteps'.

3)MAYBE I SHOULD EXPLAIN MYSELF A BIT MORE: I DO NOT THINK LAVEY HAS CREATED MUCH OF WORTH AS FEW OF "HIS" IDEAS ARE REALLY HIS OWN.
I PERCEIVE SOME OF HIS WORK AS A SIMPLIFICATION OF CROWLEY'S WRITINGS THAT HE MIXED UP WITH THE THREE ELEMENTS THAT THE AMERICANS ARE SCARED OF: SEX, SATANISM AND THE THIRD REICH.

I did discern your dislike for Lavey and his overall accomplishments, but I am not inclined to agree, and consequently responded in an upright manner.

You are however partially correct with regards to your above mentioned understandings.
A great quantity of the American people is terrified with regards to Satan and the Third Reich, and furthermore apprehensive yet fascinated with regards to sex.
And consequently Lavey's workings are incorporated with plenty of the above mentioned subjects.

A vast extent of Lavey's philosophical and literal accomplishments are furthermore but simplifications of Aliester Crowley's conceptions and writings, but in combination with supplementary sexual expositions and an additional abundance of Satan.
That I believe is an equitable remark, but I do not believe his writings are entirely without impact and consequently lacking importance.

I am inclined to say that his so-called simplified way of writing has stimulated a variety of individuals into spiritual and sexual convergence, something that I personally endorse and conceive as positive.
And by way of his penmanship he has provoked numerous men and women that found it difficult to absorb Crowley by reason of his way of writing, to ascertain individual enlightenment.

4) HAVE YOU BEEN INVOLVED WITH THE SWEDISH C.o.S.?

There is no systematic foundation of the Church of Satan in Sweden, only a widespread number of members without any direct association.
And I have not as yet involved myself at any greater distance, besides being befriended to a small number of Swedish members.

(...)So to say that Christianity is without impact is to exaggerate.
And to assume that any Christian self-decline will pursue naturally, without effort, and without acknowledging this current situation is to deceive oneself.
Equally ignorant would be to believe that cancer would disappear without treatment as long as you do not acknowledge it.

5) WHAT PERSONAL CONSEQUENCES DO YOU DRAW FROM THIS CONCLUSION?
ARE YOU A CHURCH BURNER?

What consequences do I draw from this?
Its up to each and every individual to discern what necessary measures needs to be undertaken to establish individual as well as human discharge.
I can only speak for myself, and possibly provoke others.

No I am not a church burner.
Most churches were moreover burned in Norway, and only a very small number, possibly two or three were seared throughout Sweden.

I discern little benefit from the ignition of churches.
The acts themselves, as incidents of contemporary feelings of disappointment are amusing, but neither do I believe they will obliterate the Christian faith, nor undermine the Christian foundation to any greater or conspicuous extent.

(...)Nero as well as the Roman Empire were also entertaining in certain aspects besides the religious.
Along with various other historical events, groupings and characters as part of our past, such as the entire foundation of the Third Reich and its abundance of esoteric incorporation, the World War II and the obvious feedback that concurs even this very day, the black plague along with the inquisition, to mention but a few.

6) IF YOU WOULD HAVE THE CHANCE TO WITNESS ONE OF THESE "HISTORIC EVENTS", WHICH ONE WOULD THAT BE?

In distinction to the above-mentioned episodes I would foremost enjoy witnessing the events of the Roman Empire in favor of the others.
Especially as an historical event of seemingly ceaseless debauchery and excessive indulgence, along with the Circus Maximus, and the alleged crucifixion of Jesus from Nazarene etc. etc.

But in the event of witnessing fashion I would assuredly decide in favor of Germany during the Second World War, as no army until this very day has proved able to reconstitute the aesthetic brilliance of Hugo Boss and the military fashion of the Third Reich.

(...)I certainly believe our audience and people in general should take us seriously, but nevertheless I believe they should think for themselves, further conceive, and at length contemplate on the content of our emanations.

7) HOW DO YOU THINK ABOUT RESPONSIBILITY?
DO YOU SOMETIMES WONDER WHY OR IN WHAT WAY PEOPLE MISUNDERSTAND AND MISINTERPRET YOUR WORK AND YOUR WORDS?

Responsibility is an individual trait, and solely I am responsible for myself, my individual progress, and the direct consequences of my actions.
But still irresponsible to the indirect consequences of my actions, as for instance, consequential and eventual actions related to misinterpretation.
And thus, unless threats, violence, extortion and constraint are implicated to alter the outcome, so is everyone else.

I do wonder on occasion with regards to the possible upsurge of misinterpretation and whether the majority of people who conceive our workings understand what I seek to assert.
And possibly they do.
But despite the situation that I occasionally wonder with regards to this I do not speculate with regards to how or why they occur.
And in conclusion I do not feel responsible for any eventual misinterpretations.

(...)And furthermore I believe in the natural selection, and that certain people, beyond the limitations of racial belonging, are truly more capable and genuinely suited for survival than most others.

8) THESE WORDS REMIND ME OF ARISTOCRACY.
IS THIS A SYSTEM YOU CAN IDENTIFY WITH?

I personally conceive aristocracy as a hierarchy established on the possession of estate, assets, financial resources and the alleged existence of refined bloodlines.
Not as an order established on the naturally residing capability between various individuals, where the apt unlike the inapt, are more likely to prevail.

Aristocracy or blue-blood does not instinctively ascertain the undivided incorporation of aptitude.
The natural selection by way of aptitude is much rather a prevailing order more commonly referred to as Elitism by those who disagree and find it appalling.

Aristocracy could possibly be discerned as elitism provided that you regard material resources as a trait of aptitude.
But according to my opinion aristocracy is but an order established on the possession of assets and the alleged existence of noble bloodlines, not intrinsically in relation to aptitude by way of natural selection.

Money, assets and bloodlines, neither makes a person apt.
Merely the individual is capable of procuring aptitude by way of self- perseverance.

(...)What spiritual and ideological sentiments do we share?
As Eric once said, I believe we stride along the same ideological path.
And which most likely is true as we have come to realize that we share a mutual understanding with regards to the prospective and symbolical destruction of Israel, Palestine and the Semitic regions all in all.
And which I believe is our foremost spiritual and ideological sentiment.

Nevertheless I believe we furthermore share a mutual interest in symbolical authority, mysticism and capacity, in addition to a mutual interest in the runes, and an aesthetic and symbolical fascination for the Third Reich.

9)I THINK THIS A GOOD EXAMPLE FOR WHAT SORT OF STATEMENT MIGHT STIR UP THE EXTREME LEFT...
WHY DO YOU WANT TO DESTROY ISRAEL AND PALESTINE?
I THINK THEY´RE TWO NATIONS LIKE EVERY OTHER IN THE WORLD AND THEY HAVE THE SAME RIGHT TO EXIST AS WE HAVE...

What first has to be ascertained to reduce the backfire, is that this conception is not affiliated to any racial motives.
I do not believe that either of the appointed folks or nations are of less capability by way of their ethnic belonging, as I further believe a coequal quantity of feeble men and women are likely to find as part of any ethnical group throughout the world. Whether they are Black, White, Red, or Yellow; African, Aryan, Indian or Asian.

The appointed region along with its surrounding territories is a Muslim desert consistent of one Jewish oasis.
And what I predestinate is a symbolical and conceivably ironic solution, with regard to the lyric of 'Living by the Sword. Dying by the Sword. The lustrous Banquet', to the entire Semitic conflict.
Which conclusively is responsible, by way of its seemingly perpetual antagonism, for an abundant quantity of the world's entire struggle.

No longer entirely focused to the Semitic region, the appointed conflict is spreading like boil of malignant cancer throughout the entire world.
It is infecting Europe, North America and the entire world with is incorporated magnitude of religious and political terrorism, along with its incarnated principles of justifiable castration and female subjugation, in unison with religious and sociological intolerance.
And which principles and practices are gradually tolerated by the domestic and international authorities throughout the world.
Thus I believe that they symbolically should be put to rest, finally and conclusively.

That is my sentiment.
And to realize the sincerity alongside the prevailing irony, there has to be a residing desire to comprehend and conceivably understand what I seek to manifest.
And furthermore a prospective ability to look beyond the individually residing bigotry and conceivably correlate to the understandings that are presented.

I am further apprised that such assertions are delicate and likely to upset the seemingly biased extreme left wing.
But nevertheless, why should I not be inclined to speculate with regards to the prospective destruction of the Middle East and furthermore appreciate the aesthetics of Nazi Germany?
Who are they to decide what is justified and objectionable to ascertain?
I assuredly accept that preposterous principles direct their procession, but despite this invariable condition I do not aim for their destruction.
But perhaps I should. 'Save yourself kill em all' as Tony Wakeford once put it.

(...)The entire title may therefore be interpreted in two opposite ways.
Either as the triumph of Jesus, allegedly dying as a martyr for the love and continuing existence of mankind, or optionally as the triumph of Lucifer, and love as the prevailing consequence of the crucifixion and death of Jesus.
The choice rests at the hand of the interpreter.

10) WHAT IS YOUR PERSONAL INTERPRETATION OF LUCIFER?
THERE ARE WORLDS BETWEEN THE MORE SUPERFICIAL FIGURE OF MODERN SATANISM AND THE MORE COMPLEX CHARACTER THAT WAS PART OF THE GNOSTIC MOVEMENT SUCH AS THE CATHARS, THE WALDENSIANS ETC...

Lucifer is according to my conception representative of a plenitude of assertions.
He is rising, stability and humanity, further exemplified by the untamable, the natural and the naturally instinctive.

Lucifer is likewise representative of man, as each individual status is moreover possible to discern as part of the human being.
Both as part of her consciousness as well as her subconscious, unless she yields to dogma that constrains, directs and limits her existence.

Lucifer is representative of all that, which the contemporary, monotheistic and sociologically accepted religions seek to subjugate and confine.
All that which is natural and human, and all that which would capacitate individual realization, gratification and aptitude.
And which consecutively would cause even the unenlightened human to realize that she intrinsically maintains the capability of providing for herself.
At liberty from confining principles and savage creeds.
And which conclusively would bring about the ruin of all religions.

Lucifer is by virtue of his individual nature, such as the ruler of the carnal and the mundane, balance by way of himself, intrinsic and undivided Equilibrium.

Lucifer is light and enlightenment.
He is the fire of life and the aspiration of individual vigor.
Lucifer is reason's triumph over ignorance. He is the eastern wind and Hybris personified.
Lucifer is self-perseverance.
He is the love of life and the most illustrious of angels.
Lucifer is the morning star. He is phosphorous and the illumination Venus.
Lucifer is the benefactor of humanity.
He is the carnal and mundane rather than the heavenly ethereal.
Lucifer is lust and impetuous force rather than chastity and the confinement of dynamism.

That is a selection of my understandings pertaining to Lucifer and what I believe he incorporates.

11) A FINAL MESSAGE TO OUR READERS?

Realize yourself.

Interview by Thomas Lueckewerth, Sigill Magazine